From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio(a)somainline.org>
[ Upstream commit 4a9d36b0610aa7034340e976652e5b43320dd7c5 ]
While passing the A530-specific lm_setup func to A530 and A540
to !A530 was fine back when only these two were supported, it
certainly is not a good idea to send A540 specifics to smaller
GPUs like A508 and friends.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio(a)somainline.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark(a)chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <…
[View More]sashal(a)kernel.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_power.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_power.c
index f176a6f3eff6..e58670a61df4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_power.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_power.c
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ int a5xx_power_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
/* Set up the limits management */
if (adreno_is_a530(adreno_gpu))
a530_lm_setup(gpu);
- else
+ else if (adreno_is_a540(adreno_gpu))
a540_lm_setup(gpu);
/* Set up SP/TP power collpase */
--
2.30.1
[View Less]
From: Kalyan Thota <kalyant(a)codeaurora.org>
[ Upstream commit 627dc55c273dab308303a5217bd3e767d7083ddb ]
DPU runtime resume will request for a min vote on the AXI bus as
it is a necessary step before turning ON the AXI clock.
The change does below
1) Move the icc path set before requesting runtime get_sync.
2) remove the dependency of hw catalog for min ib vote
as it is initialized at a later point.
Signed-off-by: Kalyan Thota <kalyan_t(a)codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: Matthias …
[View More]Kaehlcke <mka(a)chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark(a)chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
index 374b0e8471e6..0f1b04ef61f2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
@@ -43,6 +43,8 @@
#define DPU_DEBUGFS_DIR "msm_dpu"
#define DPU_DEBUGFS_HWMASKNAME "hw_log_mask"
+#define MIN_IB_BW 400000000ULL /* Min ib vote 400MB */
+
static int dpu_kms_hw_init(struct msm_kms *kms);
static void _dpu_kms_mmu_destroy(struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms);
@@ -931,6 +933,9 @@ static int dpu_kms_hw_init(struct msm_kms *kms)
DPU_DEBUG("REG_DMA is not defined");
}
+ if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->dev->of_node, "qcom,sc7180-mdss"))
+ dpu_kms_parse_data_bus_icc_path(dpu_kms);
+
pm_runtime_get_sync(&dpu_kms->pdev->dev);
dpu_kms->core_rev = readl_relaxed(dpu_kms->mmio + 0x0);
@@ -1032,9 +1037,6 @@ static int dpu_kms_hw_init(struct msm_kms *kms)
dpu_vbif_init_memtypes(dpu_kms);
- if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->dev->of_node, "qcom,sc7180-mdss"))
- dpu_kms_parse_data_bus_icc_path(dpu_kms);
-
pm_runtime_put_sync(&dpu_kms->pdev->dev);
return 0;
@@ -1191,10 +1193,10 @@ static int __maybe_unused dpu_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
ddev = dpu_kms->dev;
+ WARN_ON(!(dpu_kms->num_paths));
/* Min vote of BW is required before turning on AXI clk */
for (i = 0; i < dpu_kms->num_paths; i++)
- icc_set_bw(dpu_kms->path[i], 0,
- dpu_kms->catalog->perf.min_dram_ib);
+ icc_set_bw(dpu_kms->path[i], 0, Bps_to_icc(MIN_IB_BW));
rc = msm_dss_enable_clk(mp->clk_config, mp->num_clk, true);
if (rc) {
--
2.30.1
[View Less]
From: Rob Clark <robdclark(a)chromium.org>
[ Upstream commit 7ad48d27a2846bfda29214fb454d001c3e02b9e7 ]
We have seen a couple cases where low memory situations cause something
bad to happen, followed by a flood of these messages obscuring the root
cause. Lets ratelimit the dmesg spam so that next time it happens we
don't lose the kernel traces leading up to this.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark(a)chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders(a)chromium.org>
…
[View More]Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fence.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fence.c
index ad2703698b05..cd59a5918038 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fence.c
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ int msm_wait_fence(struct msm_fence_context *fctx, uint32_t fence,
int ret;
if (fence > fctx->last_fence) {
- DRM_ERROR("%s: waiting on invalid fence: %u (of %u)\n",
+ DRM_ERROR_RATELIMITED("%s: waiting on invalid fence: %u (of %u)\n",
fctx->name, fence, fctx->last_fence);
return -EINVAL;
}
--
2.30.1
[View Less]
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio(a)somainline.org>
[ Upstream commit 4a9d36b0610aa7034340e976652e5b43320dd7c5 ]
While passing the A530-specific lm_setup func to A530 and A540
to !A530 was fine back when only these two were supported, it
certainly is not a good idea to send A540 specifics to smaller
GPUs like A508 and friends.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio(a)somainline.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark(a)chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <…
[View More]sashal(a)kernel.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_power.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_power.c
index f176a6f3eff6..e58670a61df4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_power.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_power.c
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ int a5xx_power_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
/* Set up the limits management */
if (adreno_is_a530(adreno_gpu))
a530_lm_setup(gpu);
- else
+ else if (adreno_is_a540(adreno_gpu))
a540_lm_setup(gpu);
/* Set up SP/TP power collpase */
--
2.30.1
[View Less]
From: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse(a)codeaurora.org>
[ Upstream commit 8490f02a3ca45fd1bbcadc243b4db9b69d0e3450 ]
Most a6xx targets have security issues that were fixed with new versions
of the microcode(s). Make sure that we are booting with a safe version of
the microcode for the target and print a message and error if not.
v2: Add more informative error messages and fix typos
Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse(a)codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo(a)…
[View More]codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark(a)chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
index 0366419d8bfe..e7a8442b59af 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
@@ -521,28 +521,73 @@ static int a6xx_cp_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
return a6xx_idle(gpu, ring) ? 0 : -EINVAL;
}
-static void a6xx_ucode_check_version(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu,
+/*
+ * Check that the microcode version is new enough to include several key
+ * security fixes. Return true if the ucode is safe.
+ */
+static bool a6xx_ucode_check_version(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu,
struct drm_gem_object *obj)
{
+ struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = &a6xx_gpu->base;
+ struct msm_gpu *gpu = &adreno_gpu->base;
u32 *buf = msm_gem_get_vaddr(obj);
+ bool ret = false;
if (IS_ERR(buf))
- return;
+ return false;
/*
- * If the lowest nibble is 0xa that is an indication that this microcode
- * has been patched. The actual version is in dword [3] but we only care
- * about the patchlevel which is the lowest nibble of dword [3]
- *
- * Otherwise check that the firmware is greater than or equal to 1.90
- * which was the first version that had this fix built in
+ * Targets up to a640 (a618, a630 and a640) need to check for a
+ * microcode version that is patched to support the whereami opcode or
+ * one that is new enough to include it by default.
*/
- if (((buf[0] & 0xf) == 0xa) && (buf[2] & 0xf) >= 1)
- a6xx_gpu->has_whereami = true;
- else if ((buf[0] & 0xfff) > 0x190)
- a6xx_gpu->has_whereami = true;
+ if (adreno_is_a618(adreno_gpu) || adreno_is_a630(adreno_gpu) ||
+ adreno_is_a640(adreno_gpu)) {
+ /*
+ * If the lowest nibble is 0xa that is an indication that this
+ * microcode has been patched. The actual version is in dword
+ * [3] but we only care about the patchlevel which is the lowest
+ * nibble of dword [3]
+ *
+ * Otherwise check that the firmware is greater than or equal
+ * to 1.90 which was the first version that had this fix built
+ * in
+ */
+ if ((((buf[0] & 0xf) == 0xa) && (buf[2] & 0xf) >= 1) ||
+ (buf[0] & 0xfff) >= 0x190) {
+ a6xx_gpu->has_whereami = true;
+ ret = true;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ DRM_DEV_ERROR(&gpu->pdev->dev,
+ "a630 SQE ucode is too old. Have version %x need at least %x\n",
+ buf[0] & 0xfff, 0x190);
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * a650 tier targets don't need whereami but still need to be
+ * equal to or newer than 1.95 for other security fixes
+ */
+ if (adreno_is_a650(adreno_gpu)) {
+ if ((buf[0] & 0xfff) >= 0x195) {
+ ret = true;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ DRM_DEV_ERROR(&gpu->pdev->dev,
+ "a650 SQE ucode is too old. Have version %x need at least %x\n",
+ buf[0] & 0xfff, 0x195);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * When a660 is added those targets should return true here
+ * since those have all the critical security fixes built in
+ * from the start
+ */
+ }
+out:
msm_gem_put_vaddr(obj);
+ return ret;
}
static int a6xx_ucode_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
@@ -565,7 +610,13 @@ static int a6xx_ucode_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
}
msm_gem_object_set_name(a6xx_gpu->sqe_bo, "sqefw");
- a6xx_ucode_check_version(a6xx_gpu, a6xx_gpu->sqe_bo);
+ if (!a6xx_ucode_check_version(a6xx_gpu, a6xx_gpu->sqe_bo)) {
+ msm_gem_unpin_iova(a6xx_gpu->sqe_bo, gpu->aspace);
+ drm_gem_object_put(a6xx_gpu->sqe_bo);
+
+ a6xx_gpu->sqe_bo = NULL;
+ return -EPERM;
+ }
}
gpu_write64(gpu, REG_A6XX_CP_SQE_INSTR_BASE_LO,
--
2.30.1
[View Less]