It is normal that binary syncobj replaces the underlying fence.
Signed-off-by: Chunming Zhou david1.zhou@amd.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c index 929f7c64f9a2..bc7ec1679e4d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c @@ -151,9 +151,6 @@ void drm_syncobj_add_point(struct drm_syncobj *syncobj, spin_lock(&syncobj->lock);
prev = drm_syncobj_fence_get(syncobj); - /* You are adding an unorder point to timeline, which could cause payload returned from query_ioctl is 0! */ - if (prev && prev->seqno >= point) - DRM_ERROR("You are adding an unorder point to timeline!\n"); dma_fence_chain_init(chain, prev, fence, point); rcu_assign_pointer(syncobj->fence, &chain->base);