Comment # 18 on bug 82162 from sarnex

(In reply to comment #17)
> (In reply to comment #16)
> > Any chance of seeing this in the git?
> 
> Yeah, but we might want to investigate further.
> 
> Somehow the size for the CMASK buffer ends up beeing zero. It's good to
> catch that case, but we might want to figure out why it happened in the
> first place.

Anything I can do to help?