Hi Daniel,
Thank you for the patch.
On Saturday 09 January 2016 14:28:46 Daniel Vetter wrote:
There's really no reason to not do so, instead of replicating this for every use-case and every driver. Now we can't just nuke the events, since that would still mean that all drm_event users would need to know when that has happened, since calling e.g. drm_send_event isn't allowed any more. Instead just unlink them from the file, and detect this case and handle it appropriately in all functions.
v2: Adjust existing kerneldoc too.
Cc: Alex Deucher alexander.deucher@amd.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- include/drm/drmP.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c index d85af1b2a238..d32b24c74e08 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c @@ -264,6 +264,7 @@ static int drm_open_helper(struct file *filp, struct drm_minor *minor) INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->fbs); mutex_init(&priv->fbs_lock); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->blobs);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->pending_event_list); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->event_list); init_waitqueue_head(&priv->event_wait); priv->event_space = 4096; /* set aside 4k for event buffer */
@@ -353,18 +354,16 @@ static void drm_events_release(struct drm_file *file_priv) { struct drm_device *dev = file_priv->minor->dev; struct drm_pending_event *e, *et;
struct drm_pending_vblank_event *v, *vt; unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->event_lock, flags);
/* Remove pending flips */
list_for_each_entry_safe(v, vt, &dev->vblank_event_list, base.link)
if (v->base.file_priv == file_priv) {
list_del(&v->base.link);
drm_vblank_put(dev, v->pipe);
v->base.destroy(&v->base);
}
Where does this code go ?
/* Unlink pending events */
list_for_each_entry_safe(e, et, &file_priv->pending_event_list,
pending_link) {
list_del(&e->pending_link);
e->file_priv = NULL;
}
/* Remove unconsumed events */ list_for_each_entry_safe(e, et, &file_priv->event_list, link) {
@@ -712,6 +711,7 @@ int drm_event_reserve_init(struct drm_device *dev, file_priv->event_space -= e->length;
p->event = e;
list_add(&p->pending_link, &file_priv->pending_event_list); p->file_priv = file_priv;
/* we *could* pass this in as arg, but everyone uses kfree: */
@@ -736,7 +736,10 @@ void drm_event_cancel_free(struct drm_device *dev, { unsigned long flags; spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->event_lock, flags);
- p->file_priv->event_space += p->event->length;
- if (p->file_priv) {
p->file_priv->event_space += p->event->length;
list_del(&p->pending_link);
- } spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->event_lock, flags); p->destroy(p);
} @@ -750,11 +753,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_event_cancel_free);
- This function sends the event @e, initialized with
drm_event_reserve_init(),
- to its associated userspace DRM file. Callers must already hold
- dev->event_lock, see drm_send_event() for the unlocked version.
- Note that the core will take care of unlinking and disarming events when
the
- corresponding DRM file is closed. Drivers need to worry about that and
s/need to/need not/ ?
can
- call this function upon completion of the asynchrnous work
s/asynchrnous/asynchronous/
unconditionally. */ void drm_send_event_locked(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_pending_event *e) { assert_spin_locked(&dev->event_lock);
- if (!e->file_priv) {
I don't think this could happen before this patch as e->file_priv is dereferenced below, and I don't see anything in this patch that makes the condition possible.
e->destroy(e);
return;
- }
- list_del(&e->pending_link); list_add_tail(&e->link, &e->file_priv->event_list); wake_up_interruptible(&e->file_priv->event_wait);
@@ -769,6 +782,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_send_event_locked);
- This function sends the event @e, initialized with
drm_event_reserve_init(),
- to its associated userspace DRM file. This function acquires
dev->event_lock,
- see drm_send_event_locked() for callers which already hold this lock.
- Note that the core will take care of unlinking and disarming events when
the
- corresponding DRM file is closed. Drivers need to worry about that and
s/need to/need not/ ?
can
- call this function upon completion of the asynchrnous work
s/asynchrnous/asynchronous/
unconditionally. */ void drm_send_event(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_pending_event *e) { diff --git a/include/drm/drmP.h b/include/drm/drmP.h index ae73abf5c2cf..3d78a7406d54 100644 --- a/include/drm/drmP.h +++ b/include/drm/drmP.h @@ -283,6 +283,7 @@ struct drm_ioctl_desc { struct drm_pending_event { struct drm_event *event; struct list_head link;
- struct list_head pending_link; struct drm_file *file_priv; pid_t pid; /* pid of requester, no guarantee it's valid by the time we deliver the event, for tracing only */
@@ -346,6 +347,7 @@ struct drm_file { struct list_head blobs;
wait_queue_head_t event_wait;
- struct list_head pending_event_list; struct list_head event_list; int event_space;