21 Aug
2013
21 Aug
'13
1:59 a.m.
Hi Ying,
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 06:08:48PM +0800, Liu Ying wrote:
While I admit to having introduced the combination of 1/3.5 fixed divider and configurable 1/1,1/2 divder clocks to describe this fractional divider for the reasons you state, I think the correct solution would be to improve the table divider to support fractional values and get rid of the virtual ldb_di<n>_div_3_5 clocks, not introduce more virtual clocks.
Yes, it's good to support fractional values for the table divider(not sure if there is any plan for this). I see there is something similar in 'include/linux/sh_clk.h'.
Yeah, I agree with Philipp on improving table divider to support fractional values. Would you like to work on that?
Shawn