Hi Mihail.
Ack, but with one caveat: bridge->dev is the struct drm_device that is the bridge client, we need to add a bridge->device (patch 29 in this series) which is the struct device that will manage the bridge lifetime.
Other places uses the variable name "drm" for a drm_device. This is less confusion than the "dev" name.
It seems a recent trend to use the variable name "drm" so you can find a lot of places using "dev".
bike-shedding - but also about readability.
Sam