Hi Jeremiah,
On 12/30/2014 11:52 PM, Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
You changed 'i' but you didn't explain in your log message why you did this.
I can change the commit message to something more generic. "Move code outside of locked mutex" or similar.
Does this change really improve anything? It may work the same with the locks moved around. But if you look at the function as a whole, the locks encapsulate the body of this function nicely. I like the original design better.
The locking was already done this way, ie after the seq_printf, in the functions drm_clients_info() and drm_gem_name_info() in thr same file. So this change is really more of an alignment.
Best regards Jonas