On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 01:25:38AM -0700, Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
Daniel,
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 08:57:47AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Can you please retest with
commit 0aedb1626566efd72b369c01992ee7413c82a0c5 Author: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Date: Thu May 28 18:32:36 2015 +0300
drm/i915: Don't skip request retirement if the active list is emptyThanks, Daniel
The bug is still present with that patch applied. And it is still present up to linux-next 20150611.
The patch was misapplied, so what's in the tree at the moment isn't what I sent to the list.
Auch, my bad.
So we should
1) revert
commit 0aedb1626566efd72b369c01992ee7413c82a0c5 Author: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Date: Thu May 28 18:32:36 2015 +0300
drm/i915: Don't skip request retirement if the active list is empty
in v4.1
and
2) reapply http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/50659 to drm-intel-next-fixes for v4.2.
Is that right?
BR, Jani.
-- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC