On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 at 08:34, Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 2:34 AM Dave Airlie airlied@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 3 Aug 2019 at 20:47, Maxime Ripard maxime.ripard@bootlin.com wrote:
Hi Daniel, Dave,
Here is the first (and pretty late) drm-misc-next PR.
It's pretty big due to the lateness, but there's nothing really major showing up. It's pretty much the usual bunch of reworks, fixes, and new helpers being introduced.
dim: 415d2e9e0757 ("Revert "drm/gem: Rename drm_gem_dumb_map_offset() to drm_gem_map_offset()""): mandatory review missing. dim: be855382bacb ("Revert "drm/panfrost: Use drm_gem_map_offset()""): mandatory review missing. dim: e4eee93d2577 ("drm/vgem: drop DRM_AUTH usage from the driver"): mandatory review missing. dim: 88209d2c5035 ("drm/msm: drop DRM_AUTH usage from the driver"): mandatory review missing. dim: ccdae4257569 ("drm/nouveau: remove open-coded drm_invalid_op()"): mandatory review missing.
Pretty sure review in drm-misc-next is a rule. I don't even see acks on most of these.
Yes. I guess for reverts it's not cool, but also not the worst. Still better to get someone to ack, heck I can pull that off for emergency reverts with a few pings on irc, and the 2 reverts landed much later. But for normal patches it's definitely not ok at all. Also only possible if people bypass the tooling, or override the tooling with the -f flag to force a push.
Rob, Emil, what's up here?
I've got was an "Thanks" [1] from Ben on the nouveau patch - so I merged it. The msm and vgem ones are my bad - must have missed those one inbetween the other patches.
Will double-check and follow-up on all of those.
-Emil [1] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2019-May/218823.html