https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84663
Christoph Haag haagch@frickel.club changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #107328|0 |1 is obsolete| |
--- Comment #2 from Christoph Haag haagch@frickel.club --- Created attachment 107418 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=107418&action=edit sysprof
(In reply to Michel Dänzer from comment #1)
(In reply to Christoph Haag from comment #0)
sysprof recording from borderlands 2 only
Can you create another profile including all processes?
BTW, if you can make sure that at least Mesa and libdrm are compiled with -fno-omit-frame-pointer (after any other compiler flags implying -fomit-frame-pointer, such as -O), that might improve the quality of the callgraphs in the profile.
Ok, so in my first sysprof profile I had mesa compiled with -O0 -ggdb and --enable-debug. That was probably overkill, but it had hardly any effect on perceived performance.
Now this is probably more realistic. mesa is *not* compiled with --enable-debug and it *is* compiled with with "-Og -ggdb". Also libdrm is compiled with "-Og -ggdb". If I'm reading this correctly now it unfortunately looks like Borderlands 2 is consuming most of the CPU time itself now... It's still the same cpu consumption: 112-114% CPU.
So far I really have only to go on that my cpu should be good enough to not bottleneck the game this much...