On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 08:48:48AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 09:15:29AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:17 PM, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Keeping the modes in the same order as we probe them makes it a bit easier to track what's happening.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
I've just added a regression fixer to my -fixes queue which depends upon the old behaviour ... I'll make a note to fix this once stuff is merged together again. For reference the patch this will break in -fixes is:
commit c3456fb3e4712d0448592af3c5d644c9472cd3c1 Author: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch Date: Mon Jun 10 09:47:58 2013 +0200
drm/i915: prefer VBT modes for SVDO-LVDS over EDIDThat is not the only place to have a subtle dependence upon the ordering of modes in the list.
I've now included latest drm-next into drm-intel-nightly. I guess we'll find out soon ;-) -Daniel