On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 04:10:01PM +0200, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
From: Jakob Bornecrantz jakob@vmware.com
Signed-off-by: Jakob Bornecrantz jakob@vmware.com Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellstrom thellstrom@vmware.com
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c | 5 ++++- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c index c14eb76..8ac6cee 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c @@ -716,7 +716,10 @@ static int vmw_surface_dmabuf_pin(struct vmw_framebuffer *vfb) struct vmw_framebuffer_surface *vfbs = vmw_framebuffer_to_vfbs(&vfb->base); unsigned long size = vfbs->base.base.pitch * vfbs->base.base.height;
- int ret;
- struct ttm_placement ne_placement = vmw_vram_ne_placement;
- int ret = 0;
So why the 'int ret = 0' ? That looks like it belongs to a different patch?
ne_placement.lpfn = (size + (PAGE_SIZE - 1)) / PAGE_SIZE;
vfbs->buffer = kzalloc(sizeof(*vfbs->buffer), GFP_KERNEL); if (unlikely(vfbs->buffer == NULL))
-- 1.7.4.4
dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel