There is the generic stack dump on OOM so the module/line is already known.
Can such an implementation detail become better documented than in C source code?
The existence of these messages increases code size which also make the OOM condition slightly more likely.
Interesting view …
Markus' commit messages are always really poor descriptions of why these removals are somewhat useful and the commit could/should/might be applied.
I agree that they could be improved for this transformation pattern if other information sources would become clearer for corresponding references. It seems that I got no responses so far for clarification requests according to the documentation in a direction I hoped for.
Regards, Markus