On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Greg KH greg@kroah.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 06:59:59PM -0600, Rob Clark wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Greg KH greg@kroah.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 06:49:43PM -0600, Rob Clark wrote:
From: Rob Clark rob@ti.com
Update to reflect changes in: "Make the per-driver file_operations struct const"
This one I could take today, no need for me to rely on the drm api changes, right?
I don't think so, at least not if you want it to compile ;-)
Doh, you are right, sorry about that.
Previously the 'struct file_operations' was inline with the 'struct drm_driver' rather than a pointer. But if it it makes it easier for you to keep track I can keep a tree that you can pull from w/ a branch on top with the patches that depend on stuff coming in thru drm-next.
No, that would mix the two branches, and I can't do that, right?
hmm, yeah
So let's just wait for the drm-next branch to be merged with Linus, and I'll hold onto these until then, ok?
ok, great.. if you don't mind just holding them until drm-next gets pulled into Linus's tree, that would be perfect. Thanks!
BR, -R
thanks,
greg k-h _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel