11 Jan
2014
11 Jan
'14
5:01 p.m.
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 11:57:45AM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine moinejf@free.fr
This lacks a description detailing why this change is necessary. While I can see the sense in preventing a subsequent write succeeding after a failed page register write, we still continue blindly on accessing the device after a read or write fails. For istance, how many calls to reg_write() or reg_read() are checked for failure?
That said, the patch does not appear to create any detrimental effects, so it gets a tested-by but *no* acked-by. Please give it a better description justifying this change for an acked-by.
Tested-by: Russell King rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up. Estimation
in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad.
Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit".