16 Feb
2022
16 Feb
'22
2:11 p.m.
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 09:34:47PM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
On 2022/2/10 00:16, Maxime Ripard wrote:
And, to reinstate, we already have a mechanism to set an EDID, and if it wasn't an option, the DT is not the place to store an EDID blob.
Hi,
if DT is not the place to store EDID blob, why nvidia can do that ?
output->edid = of_get_property(output->of_node, "nvidia,edid", &size); [1][2]
Because that binding is 10 years old and never got reviewed by a DT maintainer.
Things change, some things we did in the past have been mistakes that we don't want to repeat, can we move forward?
Maxime