Am 16.11.21 um 06:50 schrieb zhaoxiao:
Fix following coccicheck warning: drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c:3450:26-27: WARNING opportunity for max() drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c:2812:23-24: WARNING opportunity for max()
Signed-off-by: zhaoxiao zhaoxiao@uniontech.com
In general feel free to add my Acked-by, but I'm not sure if we want such cleanups in a driver which is only in maintenance mode.
If you do this as part of a general and automated cleanup then it is probably ok.
Regards, Christian.
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c | 10 ++-------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c index 2dd85ba1faa2..c65ee6f44af2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c @@ -2809,10 +2809,7 @@ void r100_vram_init_sizes(struct radeon_device *rdev) if (rdev->mc.aper_size > config_aper_size) config_aper_size = rdev->mc.aper_size;
if (config_aper_size > rdev->mc.real_vram_size)rdev->mc.mc_vram_size = config_aper_size;elserdev->mc.mc_vram_size = rdev->mc.real_vram_size;
rdev->mc.mc_vram_size = max(config_aper_size, rdev->mc.real_vram_size);@@ -3447,10 +3444,7 @@ void r100_bandwidth_update(struct radeon_device *rdev) mc_latency_mclk.full += disp_latency_overhead.full + cur_latency_mclk.full; mc_latency_sclk.full += disp_latency_overhead.full + cur_latency_sclk.full;
- if (mc_latency_mclk.full > mc_latency_sclk.full)
disp_latency.full = mc_latency_mclk.full;- else
disp_latency.full = mc_latency_sclk.full;
disp_latency.full = max(mc_latency_mclk.full, mc_latency_sclk.full);
/* setup Max GRPH_STOP_REQ default value */ if (ASIC_IS_RV100(rdev))