Am 07.10.20 um 13:43 schrieb Ruhl, Michael J:
-----Original Message----- From: Christian König ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2020 4:52 AM To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; airlied@gmail.com; ray.huang@amd.com; Ruhl, Michael J michael.j.ruhl@intel.com Subject: [PATCH] drm/ttm: remove ttm_bo_unmap_virtual_locked declaration
That was missed during the cleanup.
Signed-off-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com
include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 9 --------- 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h index 9897a16c0a9d..b58dedce7079 100644 --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h @@ -449,15 +449,6 @@ int ttm_bo_device_init(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, */ void ttm_bo_unmap_virtual(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo);
-/**
- ttm_bo_unmap_virtual
- @bo: tear down the virtual mappings for this BO
- The caller must take ttm_mem_io_lock before calling this function.
- */
-void ttm_bo_unmap_virtual_locked(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo);
greping for ttm_bo_unmap_virtual_locked revealed this:
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_page_dirty.c: * This is similar to ttm_bo_unmap_virtual_locked() except it takes a subrange. include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h:void ttm_bo_unmap_virtual_locked(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo);
Should you clean up the vmwgvx comment to avoid confusion? 😊
Oh good point, thanks. Didn't know that the function was referenced outside of TTM anywhere anymore.
Christian.
Reviewed-by: Michael J. Ruhl michael.j.ruhl@intel.com
m
/**
- ttm_bo_reserve:
-- 2.17.1