On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 17:45:11 -0300 Igor Torrente igormtorrente@gmail.com wrote:
This commit is the groundwork to introduce new formats to the planes and writeback buffer. As part of it, a new buffer metadata field is added to `vkms_writeback_job`, this metadata is represented by the `vkms_composer` struct.
Hi,
should this be talking about vkms_frame_info struct instead?
Also adds two new function pointers (`{wb,plane}_format_transform_func`) are defined to handle format conversion to/from internal format.
These things will allow us, in the future, to have different compositing and wb format types.
V2: Change the code to get the drm_framebuffer reference and not copy its contents(Thomas Zimmermann). V3: Drop the refcount in the wb code(Thomas Zimmermann). V5: Add {wb,plane}_format_transform_func to vkms_writeback_job and vkms_plane_state (Pekka Paalanen)
Signed-off-by: Igor Torrente igormtorrente@gmail.com
drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_composer.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_drv.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++------ drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_plane.c | 10 ++++----- drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_writeback.c | 20 ++++++++++++++--- 4 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_composer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_composer.c index 2d946368a561..95029d2ebcac 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_composer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_composer.c @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ static void compose_plane(struct vkms_frame_info *primary_plane_info, struct vkms_frame_info *plane_frame_info, void *vaddr_out) {
- struct drm_framebuffer *fb = &plane_frame_info->fb;
- struct drm_framebuffer *fb = plane_frame_info->fb; void *vaddr; void (*pixel_blend)(const u8 *p_src, u8 *p_dst);
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static int compose_active_planes(void **vaddr_out, struct vkms_frame_info *primary_plane_info, struct vkms_crtc_state *crtc_state) {
- struct drm_framebuffer *fb = &primary_plane_info->fb;
- struct drm_framebuffer *fb = primary_plane_info->fb; struct drm_gem_object *gem_obj = drm_gem_fb_get_obj(fb, 0); const void *vaddr; int i;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_drv.h index 2e6342164bef..2704cfb6904b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_drv.h @@ -22,13 +22,8 @@
#define NUM_OVERLAY_PLANES 8
-struct vkms_writeback_job {
- struct dma_buf_map map[DRM_FORMAT_MAX_PLANES];
- struct dma_buf_map data[DRM_FORMAT_MAX_PLANES];
-};
struct vkms_frame_info {
- struct drm_framebuffer fb;
- struct drm_framebuffer *fb; struct drm_rect src, dst; struct dma_buf_map map[DRM_FORMAT_MAX_PLANES]; unsigned int offset;
@@ -36,6 +31,29 @@ struct vkms_frame_info { unsigned int cpp; };
+struct pixel_argb_u16 {
- u16 a, r, g, b;
+};
+struct line_buffer {
- size_t n_pixels;
- struct pixel_argb_u16 *pixels;
+};
+typedef void +(*wb_format_transform_func)(struct vkms_frame_info *frame_info,
const struct line_buffer *buffer, int y);
+typedef void +(*plane_format_transform_func)(struct line_buffer *buffer,
const struct vkms_frame_info *frame_info, int y);
It wasn't immediately obvious to me in which direction these function types work from their names. The arguments are not wb and plane but vkms_frame_info and line_buffer in both. The implementations of these functions would have nothing specific to a wb or a plane either, would they?
What about naming them frame_to_line_func and line_to_frame_func?
+struct vkms_writeback_job {
- struct dma_buf_map data[DRM_FORMAT_MAX_PLANES];
- struct vkms_frame_info frame_info;
Which frame_info is this? Should the field be called wb_frame_info?
- wb_format_transform_func format_func;
line_to_frame_func wb_write;
perhaps? The type explains the general type of the function, and the field name refers to what it is used for.
+};
/**
- vkms_plane_state - Driver specific plane state
- @base: base plane state
@@ -44,6 +62,7 @@ struct vkms_frame_info { struct vkms_plane_state { struct drm_shadow_plane_state base; struct vkms_frame_info *frame_info;
- plane_format_transform_func format_func;
Similarly here, maybe
frame_to_line_func plane_read;
perhaps?
};
struct vkms_plane { diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_plane.c index a56b0f76eddd..28752af0118c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_plane.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_plane.c @@ -50,12 +50,12 @@ static void vkms_plane_destroy_state(struct drm_plane *plane, struct vkms_plane_state *vkms_state = to_vkms_plane_state(old_state); struct drm_crtc *crtc = vkms_state->base.base.crtc;
- if (crtc) {
- if (crtc && vkms_state->frame_info->fb) { /* dropping the reference we acquired in
*/
- vkms_primary_plane_update()
if (drm_framebuffer_read_refcount(&vkms_state->frame_info->fb))
drm_framebuffer_put(&vkms_state->frame_info->fb);
if (drm_framebuffer_read_refcount(vkms_state->frame_info->fb))
drm_framebuffer_put(vkms_state->frame_info->fb);
}
kfree(vkms_state->frame_info);
@@ -110,9 +110,9 @@ static void vkms_plane_atomic_update(struct drm_plane *plane, frame_info = vkms_plane_state->frame_info; memcpy(&frame_info->src, &new_state->src, sizeof(struct drm_rect)); memcpy(&frame_info->dst, &new_state->dst, sizeof(struct drm_rect));
- memcpy(&frame_info->fb, fb, sizeof(struct drm_framebuffer));
- frame_info->fb = fb;
This change, replacing the memcpy with storing a pointer, seems to be another major point of this patch. Should it be a separate patch? It doesn't seem to fit with the current commit message.
I have no idea what kind of locking or referencing a drm_framebuffer would need, and I suspect that would be easier to review if it was a patch of its own.
memcpy(&frame_info->map, &shadow_plane_state->data, sizeof(frame_info->map));
- drm_framebuffer_get(&frame_info->fb);
- drm_framebuffer_get(frame_info->fb);
Does drm_framebuffer_get() not return anything?
To me it would be more idiomatic to write something like
frame_info->fb = drm_framebuffer_get(fb);
I don't know if that pattern is used in the kernel, but I use it in userspace to emphasise that frame_info owns a new reference rather than borrowing someone else's.
Thanks, pq
frame_info->offset = fb->offsets[0]; frame_info->pitch = fb->pitches[0]; frame_info->cpp = fb->format->cpp[0]; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_writeback.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_writeback.c index 746cb0abc6ec..ad4bb1fb37ca 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_writeback.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_writeback.c @@ -74,12 +74,15 @@ static int vkms_wb_prepare_job(struct drm_writeback_connector *wb_connector, if (!vkmsjob) return -ENOMEM;
- ret = drm_gem_fb_vmap(job->fb, vkmsjob->map, vkmsjob->data);
ret = drm_gem_fb_vmap(job->fb, vkmsjob->frame_info.map, vkmsjob->data); if (ret) { DRM_ERROR("vmap failed: %d\n", ret); goto err_kfree; }
vkmsjob->frame_info.fb = job->fb;
drm_framebuffer_get(vkmsjob->frame_info.fb);
job->priv = vkmsjob;
return 0;
@@ -98,7 +101,9 @@ static void vkms_wb_cleanup_job(struct drm_writeback_connector *connector, if (!job->fb) return;
- drm_gem_fb_vunmap(job->fb, vkmsjob->map);
drm_gem_fb_vunmap(job->fb, vkmsjob->frame_info.map);
drm_framebuffer_put(vkmsjob->frame_info.fb);
vkmsdev = drm_device_to_vkms_device(job->fb->dev); vkms_set_composer(&vkmsdev->output, false);
@@ -115,14 +120,23 @@ static void vkms_wb_atomic_commit(struct drm_connector *conn, struct drm_writeback_connector *wb_conn = &output->wb_connector; struct drm_connector_state *conn_state = wb_conn->base.state; struct vkms_crtc_state *crtc_state = output->composer_state;
struct drm_framebuffer *fb = connector_state->writeback_job->fb;
struct vkms_writeback_job *active_wb;
struct vkms_frame_info *wb_frame_info;
if (!conn_state) return;
vkms_set_composer(&vkmsdev->output, true);
active_wb = conn_state->writeback_job->priv;
wb_frame_info = &active_wb->frame_info;
spin_lock_irq(&output->composer_lock);
- crtc_state->active_writeback = conn_state->writeback_job->priv;
- crtc_state->active_writeback = active_wb;
- wb_frame_info->offset = fb->offsets[0];
- wb_frame_info->pitch = fb->pitches[0];
- wb_frame_info->cpp = fb->format->cpp[0]; crtc_state->wb_pending = true; spin_unlock_irq(&output->composer_lock); drm_writeback_queue_job(wb_conn, connector_state);