On 11/02/2022 20:27, alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com wrote:
From: Alyssa Rosenzweig alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com
From the kernel's perspective, pre-CSF Valhall is more or less compatible with Bifrost, although they differ to userspace. Add a compatible for Valhall to the existing Bifrost bindings documentation.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml index 63a08f3f321d..48aeabd2ed68 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ properties: - rockchip,px30-mali - rockchip,rk3568-mali - const: arm,mali-bifrost # Mali Bifrost GPU model/revision is fully discoverable
- const: arm,mali-valhall # Mali Valhall GPU model/revision is fully discoverable
It might be worth spelling out here that this is *pre-CSF* Valhall. I'm pretty sure we're going to need different bindings for CSF GPUs.
Steve
reg: maxItems: 1