Hi GVRao,
Thank you for the patch.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 06:16:16AM +0530, Venkateshwar Rao Gannavarapu wrote:
The Xilinx MIPI DSI (Display Serial Interface) Transmitter subsystem implements the Mobile Industry Processor Interface (MIPI) based display interface. It supports the interface with programmable logic (FPGA).
Signed-off-by: Venkateshwar Rao Gannavarapu venkateshwar.rao.gannavarapu@xilinx.com
.../devicetree/bindings/display/xlnx/xlnx,dsi.yaml | 147 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 147 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/xlnx/xlnx,dsi.yaml
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/xlnx/xlnx,dsi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/xlnx/xlnx,dsi.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..73da0d8 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/xlnx/xlnx,dsi.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
New bindings must be licensed as (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause).
+%YAML 1.2 +--- +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/xlnx/xlnx,dsi.yaml# +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+title: Xilinx Programmable DSI-TX Subsystem
+description: |
- The programmable MIPI DSI controller of Xilinx implements display pipeline
- based on DSI v1.3 specification. The subsystem includes multiple functional
- blocks as below
- +---------------+ +-----------------------------------------------+
- | | | +------------------+ |
- | | | v----------->+AXI CROSBAR |XXX |
- |FRAME BUFFER | AXI STREAM | | | X X |
- |(DMA) | +------->+ +------------+ +------------------+ XX |
- | +<------+ | |MIPI | X |
- | | | |DSI-TX | X |
- | | | |Controller | +------------+ |
- | | | | +------------->D-PHY | |
- +---------------+ | | | | | |
S_AXIS_ACLK | +-------------<------------+ | |
+---------------->+ | | |
| | | |
DPHY_CLK_200M | | | |
+---------------->+ | | |
+ | +------------+ |
| |
| MIPI DSI TX SUBSYSTEM |
+-----------------------------------------------+
- The DSI TX controller consists of multiple layers such as lane management layer,
- low-level protocol and pixel-to-byte conversion. The DSI TX controller core
- receives stream of image data through an input stream interface. The subsystem
- driver supports upto 4 lane support and generates PPI trasfers towards DPHY
DT bindings shouldn't mention drivers, you can just say "The subsystem supports up to 4 data lanes ...".
s/trasfers/transfers/
- with continuous clock. It supports Burst, non-burst modes and command modes.
+maintainers:
- Venkateshwar Rao Gannavarapu venkateshwar.rao.gannavarapu@xilinx.com
+properties:
- compatible:
- const: xlnx,dsi-1.0
I think calling it just "dsi-1.0" isn't specific enough, as it could also be a DSI RX. "xlnx,dsi-tx-1.0" would be a better value.
Is this binding for v1.0 of the IP core ? There's a v2.0 too. Only v2.0 supports command mode as far as I can tell, so with the xlnx,dsi-cmd-mode property below, this seems to match v2.0.
- reg:
- maxItems: 1
This should specify in the description if only the DSI TX registers are covered, or if the D-PHY registers are included too.
- clocks:
- description: List of clock specifiers
- items:
- description: AXI Lite clock
- description: Video DPHY clock
- clock-names:
- items:
- const: s_axis_aclk
- const: dphy_clk_200M
- xlnx,dsi-num-lanes:
- description: Maximum number of lanes that IP configured with.
possible values are 1, 2, 4.
You can drop the second sentence as it's implied by the enum below.
- allOf:
- $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
- enum: [1, 2, 4]
Do we need this property ? The protocol configuration register has an Active Lanes field that reports the number of lanes. Could we read the information from the register, and drop this property ?
- xlnx,dsi-data-type:
- description: MIPI DSI pixel format.
possible values are 0, 1, 2, 3.
Same here.
- allOf:
- $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
- enum: [0, 1, 2, 3]
Same comment as above, should this be read from the Pixel Format field instead of being specified in DT ?
- xlnx,dsi-cmd-mode:
- description: denotes command mode support
- allOf:
- $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
- enum: [0, 1]
I don't see a command mode user parameter in the datasheet, it seems that command mode is a runtime configuration parameter (bit 3 in the Core Configuration Register). It shouldn't be specified in DT, but queried at runtime from the connected panel.
- ports:
- type: object
- properties:
port@0:
type: object
description: |
output / source port node, endpoint describing modules
connected the DSI TX subsystem
properties:
reg:
const: 0
endpoint:
type: object
properties:
remote-endpoint: true
required:
- remote-endpoint
additionalProperties: false
additionalProperties: false
There should also be a port for the AXI4-Stream interface. The common practice is to number the input port@0 and the output port@1.
Shouldn't ports specify
required: - port@0 - port@1
?
+required:
- compatible
- reg
- clocks
- clock-names
- xlnx,dsi-num-lanes
- xlnx,dsi-data-type
- xlnx,dsi-cmd-mode
- ports
+additionalProperties: false
+examples:
- |
- mipi_dsi_tx_subsystem@80000000 {
compatible = "xlnx,dsi-1.0";
reg = <0x0 0x80000000 0x0 0x10000>;
DT examples are compiled in a context where #address-cells and #size-cells are both set to 1. The reg property should thus be <0x80000000 0x10000>; in the example, even if it doesn't match the hardware.
Could you please validate the bindings with
make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/xlnx/xlnx,dsi.yaml
as explained in Documentation/devicetree/writing-schema.rst ? This will also compile the example to make sure that everything is right.
clocks = <&misc_clk_0>, <&misc_clk_1>;
clock-names = "s_axis_aclk", "dphy_clk_200M";
xlnx,dsi-num-lanes = <4>;
xlnx,dsi-data-type = <1>;
xlnx,dsi-cmd-mode = <0>;
ports {
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
port@0 {
reg = <0x0>;
dsi_tx_out: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&panel_in>;
};
};
};
- };
+...