On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:43:38AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/26/2012 07:41 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:01:05PM +0300, Terje Bergström wrote:
On 26.06.2012 13:55, Thierry Reding wrote:
...
status = "disabled";
gart = <&gart>;
/* video-encoding/decoding */ mpe { reg = <0x54040000 0x00040000>; interrupts = <0 68 0x04>; status = "disabled"; };
The client device interrupts are not very interesting, so they could be left out, too. Display controller related are probably an exception to this.
If the interrupts aren't used at all we should drop them.
I disagree here; "used" is most likely something specific to a particular OS's drivers. The HW always has the interrupts, and hence they should be described in DT.
Okay, I see. Does the same apply to the COP interrupts of the host1x node in your opinion? I don't know if it makes sense to describe something that's not reachable from the CPU. Yet it is defined in the GIC.
Thierry