4 Dec
2017
4 Dec
'17
1:46 p.m.
Hi Laurent,
Am Montag, 4. Dezember 2017, 15:22:07 CET schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:47:55 EET Brian Norris wrote:
From: Nickey Yang nickey.yang@rock-chips.com
We might include additional ports in derivative device trees, so the 'port' node should have an address, and the parent 'ports' node needs /#{addres,size}-cells.
v4:
- keep #{address,size}-cells in both 'ports' and 'port@0' nodes
- separate from the rest of the series, since this is mostly independent of the driver refactoring
Signed-off-by: Nickey Yang nickey.yang@rock-chips.com Signed-off-by: Brian Norris briannorris@chromium.org
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com
As I hadn't pushed that one yet, I've amended it with your Review-tag :-)
Thanks Heiko