Hi Nickey,
Thank you for the patch.
On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:47:55 EET Brian Norris wrote:
From: Nickey Yang nickey.yang@rock-chips.com
We might include additional ports in derivative device trees, so the 'port' node should have an address, and the parent 'ports' node needs /#{addres,size}-cells.
v4:
- keep #{address,size}-cells in both 'ports' and 'port@0' nodes
- separate from the rest of the series, since this is mostly independent of the driver refactoring
Signed-off-by: Nickey Yang nickey.yang@rock-chips.com Signed-off-by: Brian Norris briannorris@chromium.org
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com
arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi index d340b58ab184..c6dae25a3f23 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi @@ -1652,7 +1652,11 @@ status = "disabled";
ports {
mipi_in: port {
#address-cells = <1>;#size-cells = <0>;mipi_in: port@0 {reg = <0>; #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>;