On 09/27/2016 06:58 PM, Sean Paul wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Tomeu Vizoso tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com wrote:
There's no point in enabling PSR when the panel doesn't support it.
This also avoids a problem when PSR gets enabled when a CRTC is being disabled, because sometimes in that situation the DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR interrupt on which we wait will never arrive. This was observed on RK3288 with a panel without PSR (veyron-jaq Chromebook).
It's very easy to reproduce by running the kms_rmfb test in IGT a few times.
Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com
Thanks for digging into this.
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul seanpaul@chromium.org
queued to drm-misc.
Archit
Cc: Sean Paul seanpaul@chromium.org Cc: Yakir Yang ykk@rock-chips.com Cc: Archit Taneja architt@codeaurora.org
drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c index e83be157cc2a..8548e8271639 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c @@ -85,6 +85,9 @@ static void analogix_dp_psr_set(struct drm_encoder *encoder, bool enabled) struct rockchip_dp_device *dp = to_dp(encoder); unsigned long flags;
if (!analogix_dp_psr_supported(dp->dev))return;dev_dbg(dp->dev, "%s PSR...\n", enabled ? "Entry" : "Exit"); spin_lock_irqsave(&dp->psr_lock, flags);-- 2.7.4