Comment # 36 on bug 61182 from Alex Deucher

(In reply to comment #34)
> I'm not saying that comment #29 is wrong.  I'm saying that the existing code
> ought to have been written to handle this case.  Clearly one solution is to
> replace the code as suggested.  But fixing the code ought to be feasible
> too.  Are there other lurking bugs where code assumes addressability?
> 

It's a bug that needs to be fixed.