28 Aug
2020
28 Aug
'20
4:52 p.m.
It seems that 0-day picks up new semantic patches that are added to trees in kernel.org, but that it's strategy for generating the patch is not ideal. I'll just drop these Fixes lines.
* How do you think about to adjust also the prefix for subjects of generated patches?
Another example: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2008272211260.2482@ha... https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1296616/ https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/27/1377
* Do any scripts (from the continuous integration system) need further improvements for the safe and clear application of patch results?
Regards, Markus