On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 10:08 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 09:56:46AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
I have a patchset that creates a vsprintf extension for print_vma_addr and removes all the uses similar to the print_symbol() removal.
This now avoids any possible printk interleaving.
Unfortunately, without some #ifdef in vsprintf, which I would like to avoid, it increases the nommu kernel size by ~500 bytes.
Anyone think this is acceptable?
[]
This doesn't feel like a huge win since it's only called ~once per architecture. I'd be more excited if it made the printing of the whole thing standardised; eg we have a print_fault() function in mm/memory.c which takes a suitable set of arguments.
Sure but perhaps that's not feasible as the surrounding output is per-arch specific.
What could be a standardized fault message here?