https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61182
--- Comment #41 from Niels Ole Salscheider niels_ole@salscheider-online.de --- As I said before, the dma_fill function is based on dma_copy and I tried to keep the diff small. But you are right, this could be improved.
Have you created a patch to get these functions called in place of the currently broken code?
I did but I was missing the context that is needed to call the dma_fill function. You can try Marek's patches on the mailing list, they work well for me.
You can try to replace the call to util_blitter_clear_buffer with the dma_fill version if you are interested in it. But I don't think that you will see any noticeable difference (given the assumtion that the dma version works).