On 2020-02-28 10:28 a.m., Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
We could also do stuff like reducing the amount of tests we run on each commit, and punt some testing to a per-weekend test-run or someting like that. We don't *need* to know about every problem up front, just the stuff that's about to be released, really. The other stuff is just nice to have. If it's too expensive, I would say drop it.
I don't agree that pre-merge testing is just nice to have. A problem which is only caught after it lands in mainline has a much bigger impact than one which is already caught earlier.