On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:41:47PM +0000, John Keeping wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:16:09 -0500, Sean Paul wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 06:14:27PM +0000, John Keeping wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 10:26:11 -0500, Sean Paul wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 01:24:44PM +0000, John Keeping wrote:
I haven't found any method for getting the length of a response, so this just uses the requested rx_len
Signed-off-by: John Keeping john@metanate.com
v3:
- Fix checkpatch warnings
Unchanged in v2
drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c index cf3ca6b0cbdb..cc58ada75425 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c @@ -678,6 +678,56 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_dcs_long_write(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi, return dw_mipi_dsi_gen_pkt_hdr_write(dsi, hdr_val); }
+static int dw_mipi_dsi_dcs_read(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi,
const struct mipi_dsi_msg *msg)
+{
- const u8 *tx_buf = msg->tx_buf;
- u8 *rx_buf = msg->rx_buf;
- size_t i;
- int ret, val;
- dsi_write(dsi, DSI_PCKHDL_CFG, EN_CRC_RX | EN_ECC_RX | EN_BTA);
- dsi_write(dsi, DSI_GEN_HDR,
GEN_HDATA(tx_buf[0]) | GEN_HTYPE(msg->type));
- ret = readl_poll_timeout(dsi->base + DSI_CMD_PKT_STATUS,
val, !(val & GEN_RD_CMD_BUSY), 1000,
CMD_PKT_STATUS_TIMEOUT_US);
- if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(dsi->dev, "failed to read command response\n");
return ret;
- }
- for (i = 0; i < msg->rx_len;) {
u32 pld = dsi_read(dsi, DSI_GEN_PLD_DATA);
while (i < msg->rx_len) {
rx_buf[i] = pld & 0xff;
pld >>= 8;
i++;
}
- }
AFAICT, the outer for loop just initializes i and ensures msg->rx_len is non-zero?
I think the following would be easier to read (and safe against the case where msg->rx_len > sizeof(pld) (even though this shouldn't happen according to DCS spec)).
if (msg->rx_len > 0) { u32 pld = dsi_read(dsi, DSI_GEN_PLD_DATA); memcpy(rx_buf, &pld, MIN(msg->rx_len, sizeof(pld)); }
I think the intent was to handle rx_len > 4, but the patch is obvously completely broken regarding that. As far as I can tell, rx_len is limited by the maximum return packet size which can be any value up to the maximum size of a long packet, so we may need to read from the FIFO multiple times.
The loop should be something like this:
for (i = 0; i < msg->rx_len;) { u32 pld = dsi_read(dsi, DSI_GEN_PLD_DATA); int j;
for (j = 0; j < 4 && i < msg->rx_len; i++, j++) { rx_buf[i] = pld & 0xff; pld >>= 8; }
}
Short packets should never exceed 32 bits, so I don't think you need to add the nested loop.
The read response is not restricted to a short packet. I have a panel that documents a read request that returns up to 64KiB, admittedly with a continuation command and the panels I have seem to only be programmed to return 5 bytes of meaningful data, but they do return all of those bytes in a single read response.
Ah, apologies for the misunderstanding. In that case, I think you can get away with replacing the inner loop in your snippet with a memcpy and call it a day.
Sean
dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel