On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 04:20:50PM +0400, Miaoqian Lin wrote:
The pm_runtime_enable will increase power disable depth. If the probe fails, we should use pm_runtime_disable() to balance pm_runtime_enable(). Also call disable function in remove function.
Fixes: 57692c94dcbe ("drm/v3d: Introduce a new DRM driver for Broadcom V3D V3.x+") Signed-off-by: Miaoqian Lin linmq006@gmail.com
Changes in v3:
- call pm_runtime_disable() in v3d_platform_drm_remove
- update commit message
Changes in v2
- put pm_runtime_disable before dma_free_wc
- rename dma_free to pm_disable
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220105120442.14418-1-linmq006@gmail.com v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220106124657.32737-1-linmq006@gmail.com
Maybe a bit late since we're at v3 already, but are there no devm_ functions here that would dtrt automatically? Or is there another reason we can't use them? -Daniel
drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_drv.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_drv.c index 1afcd54fbbd5..f3380399fe17 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_drv.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_drv.c @@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ static int v3d_platform_drm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
ret = v3d_gem_init(drm); if (ret)
goto dma_free;
goto pm_disable;
ret = v3d_irq_init(v3d); if (ret)
@@ -302,7 +302,8 @@ static int v3d_platform_drm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) v3d_irq_disable(v3d); gem_destroy: v3d_gem_destroy(drm); -dma_free: +pm_disable:
- pm_runtime_disable(dev); dma_free_wc(dev, 4096, v3d->mmu_scratch, v3d->mmu_scratch_paddr); return ret;
} @@ -316,6 +317,7 @@ static int v3d_platform_drm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
v3d_gem_destroy(drm);
- pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev); dma_free_wc(v3d->drm.dev, 4096, v3d->mmu_scratch, v3d->mmu_scratch_paddr);
-- 2.25.1