Noticed this while working on adding a drm_dp_decode_sideband_req(). DP_POWER_DOWN_PHY/DP_POWER_UP_PHY both use the same struct as DP_ENUM_PATH_RESOURCES, so we can just combine their cases.
Changes since v2: * Fix commit message
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul lyude@redhat.com Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie airlied@redhat.com Cc: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch Cc: Juston Li juston.li@intel.com Cc: Imre Deak imre.deak@intel.com Cc: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Cc: Harry Wentland hwentlan@amd.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c index 6f7f449ca12b..1c862749cb63 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c @@ -271,6 +271,8 @@ static void drm_dp_encode_sideband_req(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_req_body *req,
switch (req->req_type) { case DP_ENUM_PATH_RESOURCES: + case DP_POWER_DOWN_PHY: + case DP_POWER_UP_PHY: buf[idx] = (req->u.port_num.port_number & 0xf) << 4; idx++; break; @@ -358,12 +360,6 @@ static void drm_dp_encode_sideband_req(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_req_body *req, memcpy(&buf[idx], req->u.i2c_write.bytes, req->u.i2c_write.num_bytes); idx += req->u.i2c_write.num_bytes; break; - - case DP_POWER_DOWN_PHY: - case DP_POWER_UP_PHY: - buf[idx] = (req->u.port_num.port_number & 0xf) << 4; - idx++; - break; } raw->cur_len = idx; }