31 Mar
2014
31 Mar
'14
4:28 p.m.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 04:40:47PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 06:08:51PM +0300, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Currently drm_cflush_virt_rage() takes a char* so the caller probably has to do pointless casting to avoid compiler warnings. Make the argument void* instead to avoid such issues.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Can we not use a gcc'ism to allow pointer arithmetic on void *?
Personally I'd be fine with that. So if no one disagrees I can send a v2.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC