On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:03:54AM +0800, Mark Yao wrote:
Vop Full framework now has following vops: IP version chipname 3.1 rk3288 3.2 rk3368 3.4 rk3366 3.5 rk3399 big 3.6 rk3399 lit
Below you say little vop is major == 2, but you have major == 3 here.
3.7 rk3228 3.8 rk3328
The above IP version is from H/W define, some of vop support get the IP version from VERSION_INFO register, some are not. hardcode the IP version for each vop to identify them.
major version: used for IP structure, Vop full framework is 3, vop little framework is 2. minor version: on same structure, newer design vop will bigger then old one.
Changes in v2:
- rename rk322x to rk3228(Heiko Stübner)
- correct some vop registers define
Signed-off-by: Mark Yao mark.yao@rock-chips.com
drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c | 202 +++++-- drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.h | 905 ++++++++++++++++++++++------ 2 files changed, 863 insertions(+), 244 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c index 159cedf..b33483c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c @@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ .standby = VOP_REG(RK3288_SYS_CTRL, 0x1, 22), .gate_en = VOP_REG(RK3288_SYS_CTRL, 0x1, 23), .mmu_en = VOP_REG(RK3288_SYS_CTRL, 0x1, 20),
- .dp_en = VOP_REG_VER(RK3399_SYS_CTRL, 0x1, 11, 3, 5, -1), .rgb_en = VOP_REG(RK3288_SYS_CTRL, 0x1, 12), .hdmi_en = VOP_REG(RK3288_SYS_CTRL, 0x1, 13), .edp_en = VOP_REG(RK3288_SYS_CTRL, 0x1, 14),
@@ -220,14 +221,19 @@ .data_blank = VOP_REG(RK3288_DSP_CTRL0, 0x1, 19), .dsp_blank = VOP_REG(RK3288_DSP_CTRL0, 0x3, 18), .out_mode = VOP_REG(RK3288_DSP_CTRL0, 0xf, 0),
- .pin_pol = VOP_REG(RK3288_DSP_CTRL0, 0xf, 4),
- .pin_pol = VOP_REG_VER(RK3288_DSP_CTRL0, 0xf, 4, 3, 0, 1),
- .dp_pin_pol = VOP_REG_VER(RK3399_DSP_CTRL1, 0xf, 16, 3, 5, -1),
- .rgb_pin_pol = VOP_REG_VER(RK3368_DSP_CTRL1, 0xf, 16, 3, 2, -1),
- .hdmi_pin_pol = VOP_REG_VER(RK3368_DSP_CTRL1, 0xf, 20, 3, 2, -1),
- .edp_pin_pol = VOP_REG_VER(RK3368_DSP_CTRL1, 0xf, 24, 3, 2, -1),
- .mipi_pin_pol = VOP_REG_VER(RK3368_DSP_CTRL1, 0xf, 28, 3, 2, -1), .htotal_pw = VOP_REG(RK3288_DSP_HTOTAL_HS_END, 0x1fff1fff, 0), .hact_st_end = VOP_REG(RK3288_DSP_HACT_ST_END, 0x1fff1fff, 0), .vtotal_pw = VOP_REG(RK3288_DSP_VTOTAL_VS_END, 0x1fff1fff, 0), .vact_st_end = VOP_REG(RK3288_DSP_VACT_ST_END, 0x1fff1fff, 0), .hpost_st_end = VOP_REG(RK3288_POST_DSP_HACT_INFO, 0x1fff1fff, 0), .vpost_st_end = VOP_REG(RK3288_POST_DSP_VACT_INFO, 0x1fff1fff, 0),
- .global_regdone_en = VOP_REG(RK3288_SYS_CTRL, 0x1, 11),
- .global_regdone_en = VOP_REG_VER(RK3288_SYS_CTRL, 0x1, 11, 3, 2, -1), .cfg_done = VOP_REG(RK3288_REG_CFG_DONE, 0x1, 0),
I'm not really convinced VOP_REG_VER is a good idea. In the case of dp_en and pin_pol, the register is already used for different offsets, so presumably you're writing into don't care offsets?
In the other cases, it just looks like a few new registers added for 3368 and 3399. In this scenario, I don't think it's that bad to just have separate structs for each version that has distinct features. There's going to be more duplication, but then it's super easy to understand which platform has which registers.
The whole versioning system is a little strange. For example, is each version guaranteed to have the registered defined for the previous version (ie: 3.6 contains all registers defined for 3.5)?
Sean
<snip>
-- 1.9.1
dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel