1 Sep
2012
1 Sep
'12
7:22 p.m.
On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 11:35:13 -0700, Ben Widawsky ben@bwidawsk.net wrote:
I have no problem with Daniel's patch. It's just a matter of cutting through some scheduler BS of "when the GPU wants to change frequency" vs. "when we actually change the GPU frequency." I think *both* are interesting.
We already trace the interrupt, which has been invaluable in debugging. And there is no other source currently... :) -Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre