On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 8:13 AM Fabio Estevam festevam@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Rob,
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:44 AM Rob Clark robdclark@gmail.com wrote:
I think that might not help if something fails to probe due to (for example) a missing dependency, so !priv->kms is probably a better check to cover both cases. But the 2nd patch makes a good point, that the suspend/resume path probably needs the same treatment
Thanks for the feedback. I will follow the same approach for fixing the suspend/resume path then.
Let me test it and then I will re-submit Dmitry's patch and the one for suspend/resume as part of a patch series.
Thanks,
BR, -R