Hi Yunfei,
Thank you for addressing my questions and comments.
Note that my comments for formatting are usually based on standards from chromium & chrome os. So feel free to reflect only if you think it is relevant.
Reviewed-by: Steve Cho stevecho@chromium.org
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 12:52 AM yunfei.dong@mediatek.com yunfei.dong@mediatek.com wrote:
Hi steve,
Thanks for your suggestion.
On Thu, 2021-12-09 at 15:44 -0800, Steve Cho wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 7:46 PM Yunfei Dong yunfei.dong@mediatek.com wrote:
Add work queue to process core hardware information. First, get lat_buf from message queue, then call core hardware of each codec(H264/VP9/AV1) to decode, finally puts lat_buf back to the message.
Signed-off-by: Yunfei Dong yunfei.dong@mediatek.com
.../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_drv.c | 16 +++++++- .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_drv.h | 3 ++ .../platform/mtk-vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++--- .../platform/mtk-vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.h | 8 ++-- 4 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_drv.c b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_drv.c index d460703f335d..4fbff61d2334 100644 --- a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_drv.c +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_drv.c @@ -341,6 +341,17 @@ static int mtk_vcodec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) goto err_dec_pm; }
if (IS_VDEC_LAT_ARCH(dev->vdec_pdata->hw_arch)) {
vdec_msg_queue_init_ctx(&dev->msg_queue_core_ctx,
MTK_VDEC_CORE);
dev->core_workqueue =
alloc_ordered_workqueue("core-decoder",
WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_FREEZABLE);
if (!dev->core_workqueue) {
mtk_v4l2_err("Failed to create core
workqueue");
ret = -EINVAL;
goto err_res;
}
}
for (i = 0; i < MTK_VDEC_HW_MAX; i++) mutex_init(&dev->dec_mutex[i]); spin_lock_init(&dev->irqlock);
@@ -351,7 +362,7 @@ static int mtk_vcodec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) ret = v4l2_device_register(&pdev->dev, &dev->v4l2_dev); if (ret) { mtk_v4l2_err("v4l2_device_register err=%d", ret);
goto err_res;
goto err_core_workq; } init_waitqueue_head(&dev->queue);
@@ -450,6 +461,9 @@ static int mtk_vcodec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) video_unregister_device(vfd_dec); err_dec_alloc: v4l2_device_unregister(&dev->v4l2_dev); +err_core_workq:
if (IS_VDEC_LAT_ARCH(dev->vdec_pdata->hw_arch))
destroy_workqueue(dev->core_workqueue);
err_res: mtk_vcodec_release_dec_pm(&dev->pm); err_dec_pm: diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_drv.h b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_drv.h index cbaed96dcfa2..a558cc16026d 100644 --- a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_drv.h +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_drv.h @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ #define MTK_VCODEC_MAX_PLANES 3 #define MTK_V4L2_BENCHMARK 0 #define WAIT_INTR_TIMEOUT_MS 1000 +#define IS_VDEC_LAT_ARCH(hw_arch) ((hw_arch) >= MTK_VDEC_LAT_SINGLE_CORE)
Basic question: What is practical meaning of this? What architectures are supported?
This definition is used to separate different architectures. Pure single core/lat single core at current period is supported.
/*
- enum mtk_hw_reg_idx - MTK hw register base index
@@ -464,6 +465,7 @@ struct mtk_vcodec_enc_pdata {
- @dec_capability: used to identify decode capability, ex: 4k
- @enc_capability: used to identify encode capability
- @core_workqueue: queue used for core hardware decode
- @msg_queue_core_ctx: msg queue context used for core workqueue
- @subdev_dev: subdev hardware device
@@ -506,6 +508,7 @@ struct mtk_vcodec_dev { unsigned int dec_capability; unsigned int enc_capability;
struct workqueue_struct *core_workqueue; struct vdec_msg_queue_ctx msg_queue_core_ctx; void *subdev_dev[MTK_VDEC_HW_MAX];
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c index 913aefa67618..24f1d03df9f1 100644 --- a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c @@ -68,6 +68,9 @@ int vdec_msg_queue_qbuf(struct vdec_msg_queue_ctx *msg_ctx, struct vdec_lat_buf
if (msg_ctx->hardware_index != MTK_VDEC_CORE) wake_up_all(&msg_ctx->ready_to_use);
else
queue_work(buf->ctx->dev->core_workqueue,
&buf->ctx->msg_queue.core_work);
need {} for else here?
If condition not add "{}", else need not to add "{}" ?
I was suggesting as it had 2 lines.
mtk_v4l2_debug(3, "enqueue buf type: %d addr: 0x%p num:
%d", msg_ctx->hardware_index, buf, msg_ctx->ready_num); @@ -169,8 +172,7 @@ bool vdec_msg_queue_wait_lat_buf_full(struct vdec_msg_queue *msg_queue) return false; }
-void vdec_msg_queue_deinit(
struct vdec_msg_queue *msg_queue,
+void vdec_msg_queue_deinit(struct vdec_msg_queue *msg_queue, struct mtk_vcodec_ctx *ctx) { struct vdec_lat_buf *lat_buf; @@ -196,10 +198,36 @@ void vdec_msg_queue_deinit( } }
-int vdec_msg_queue_init(
struct vdec_msg_queue *msg_queue,
struct mtk_vcodec_ctx *ctx,
core_decode_cb_t core_decode,
+static void vdec_msg_queue_core_work(struct work_struct *work) +{
struct vdec_msg_queue *msg_queue =
container_of(work, struct vdec_msg_queue,
core_work);
struct mtk_vcodec_ctx *ctx =
container_of(msg_queue, struct mtk_vcodec_ctx,
msg_queue);
struct mtk_vcodec_dev *dev = ctx->dev;
struct vdec_lat_buf *lat_buf;
lat_buf = vdec_msg_queue_dqbuf(&dev->msg_queue_core_ctx);
if (!lat_buf)
return;
If we were to return in this error condition, isn't it better to also differentiate this error with return code and change void return type?
vdec_msg_queue_core_work function is callback for param "func" in struct work_struct, need not to add return value.
ctx = lat_buf->ctx;
mtk_vcodec_set_curr_ctx(dev, ctx, MTK_VDEC_CORE);
lat_buf->core_decode(lat_buf);
mtk_vcodec_set_curr_ctx(dev, NULL, MTK_VDEC_CORE);
vdec_msg_queue_qbuf(&ctx->msg_queue.lat_ctx, lat_buf);
if (!list_empty(&ctx->msg_queue.lat_ctx.ready_queue)) {
mtk_v4l2_debug(3, "re-schedule to decode for core",
dev->msg_queue_core_ctx.ready_num);
queue_work(dev->core_workqueue, &msg_queue-
core_work);
}
+}
+int vdec_msg_queue_init(struct vdec_msg_queue *msg_queue,
struct mtk_vcodec_ctx *ctx, core_decode_cb_t
core_decode, int private_size) { struct vdec_lat_buf *lat_buf; @@ -210,6 +238,7 @@ int vdec_msg_queue_init( return 0;
vdec_msg_queue_init_ctx(&msg_queue->lat_ctx,
MTK_VDEC_LAT0);
INIT_WORK(&msg_queue->core_work, vdec_msg_queue_core_work); msg_queue->wdma_addr.size = vde_msg_queue_get_trans_size( ctx->picinfo.buf_w, ctx->picinfo.buf_h);
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.h b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.h index 21a9c0aeb1b4..43eae638a2a8 100644 --- a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.h +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.h @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ struct vdec_lat_buf {
- @wdma_addr: wdma address used for ube
- @wdma_rptr_addr: ube read point
- @wdma_wptr_addr: ube write point
*/
- @core_work: core hardware work
- @lat_ctx: used to store lat buffer list
struct vdec_msg_queue { @@ -76,6 +77,7 @@ struct vdec_msg_queue { uint64_t wdma_rptr_addr; uint64_t wdma_wptr_addr;
struct work_struct core_work; struct vdec_msg_queue_ctx lat_ctx;
};
@@ -86,10 +88,8 @@ struct vdec_msg_queue {
- @core_decode: core decode callback for each codec
- @private_size: the private data size used to share with core
*/ -int vdec_msg_queue_init(
struct vdec_msg_queue *msg_queue,
struct mtk_vcodec_ctx *ctx,
core_decode_cb_t core_decode,
+int vdec_msg_queue_init(struct vdec_msg_queue *msg_queue,
struct mtk_vcodec_ctx *ctx, core_decode_cb_t
core_decode,
Not sure about the formatting rule, but is it supposed to be one param per line? If so, this comment also applied to function definition part.
int private_size);
I try to review other files, it looks that two or more parameters per line is ok. Whether you mean that we'd better to write one parameter per line? int vdec_msg_queue_init(struct vdec_msg_queue *msg_queue, struct mtk_vcodec_ctx *ctx, core_decode_cb_t
Yes, that's what I meant, but you are welcome to keep current change.
Thanks, Yunfei Dong
/**
2.25.1