Hi Rob,
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 12:09:12PM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 11:44 AM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 04:52:49PM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
From: Rob Clark robdclark@chromium.org
For the brave new world of bridges not creating their own connectors, we need to implement the max clock limitation via bridge->mode_valid() instead of connector->mode_valid().
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark robdclark@chromium.org
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c index 5d3b30b2f547..38dcc49eccaf 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c @@ -595,6 +595,15 @@ static struct auxiliary_driver ti_sn_aux_driver = { .id_table = ti_sn_aux_id_table, };
+static enum drm_mode_status check_mode(const struct drm_display_mode *mode) +{
/* maximum supported resolution is 4K at 60 fps */
if (mode->clock > 594000)
return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
return MODE_OK;
+}
/* -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- DRM Connector Operations
*/ @@ -616,11 +625,7 @@ static enum drm_mode_status ti_sn_bridge_connector_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector, struct drm_display_mode *mode) {
/* maximum supported resolution is 4K at 60 fps */
if (mode->clock > 594000)
return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
return MODE_OK;
return check_mode(mode);
Do we need to implement the connector .mode_valid() operation, given that the bridge is linked in the chain ?
My understanding is that we need to keep it for display drivers that are not converted to NO_CONNECTOR..
But AFAIK snapdragon is the only upstream user of this bridge, so after the drm/msm/dsi patch lands we could probably garbage collect the connector support.
Even in the !NO_CONNECTOR case, the bridge will still be linked in the chain, so the atomic helpers should call the bridge .mode_valid() in addition to the connector .mode_valid(). I think the connector operation is redundant.
}
static struct drm_connector_helper_funcs ti_sn_bridge_connector_helper_funcs = { @@ -763,6 +768,14 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_detach(struct drm_bridge *bridge) drm_dp_aux_unregister(&bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge)->aux); }
+static enum drm_mode_status +ti_sn_bridge_mode_valid(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
const struct drm_display_info *info,
const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
+{
return check_mode(mode);
+}
static void ti_sn_bridge_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge) { struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge); @@ -1118,6 +1131,7 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge) static const struct drm_bridge_funcs ti_sn_bridge_funcs = { .attach = ti_sn_bridge_attach, .detach = ti_sn_bridge_detach,
.mode_valid = ti_sn_bridge_mode_valid, .pre_enable = ti_sn_bridge_pre_enable, .enable = ti_sn_bridge_enable, .disable = ti_sn_bridge_disable,