On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 05:42:44PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 04:04:14PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
@@ -75,20 +75,16 @@ static int fbtft_request_one_gpio(struct fbtft_par *par, struct gpio_desc **gpiop) { struct device *dev = par->info->device;
int ret = 0;
*gpiop = devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(dev, name, index, GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
if (IS_ERR(*gpiop)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(*gpiop);
dev_err(dev,
"Failed to request %s GPIO: %d\n", name, ret);
return ret;
}
- if (IS_ERR(*gpiop))
dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(*gpiop), "Failed to request %s GPIO\n", name);
This should be a return statement:
return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(*gpiop), "Failed to request %s GPIO\n", name);
I've created a new Smatch check for these:
drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-core.c:2890 mcp251xfd_probe() warn: pointer error 'PTR_ERR(clk)' not handled
There aren't that many bugs... Anyway, I'm running a test now and I guess we'll see tomorrow how it goes.
regards, dan carpenter