On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 5:17 AM Neil Armstrong narmstrong@baylibre.com wrote:
Hi Rob,
Le 01/04/2019 13:24, Neil Armstrong a écrit :
On 01/04/2019 12:00, Steven Price wrote:
On 01/04/2019 09:09, Neil Armstrong wrote:
Add the bindings for the Bifrost family of ARM Mali GPUs.
The Bifrost GPU architecture is similar to the Midgard family, but with a different Shader Core & Execution Engine structures.
Bindings are based on the Midgard family bindings, but the inner architectural changes makes it a separate family needing separate bindings.
The Bifrost GPUs are present in a number of recent SoCs, like the Amlogic G12A Family, and many other vendors. The Amlogic vendor specific compatible is added to handle the specific IP integration differences and dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong narmstrong@baylibre.com
.../bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.txt | 92 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.txt
Changes since v3:
- Added note about discoverable model/revision
- Enforced fixed defined irq order
- Fixed typo in accommodate
Changes since v2:
- moved to a single compatible since HW is fully discoverable
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.txt new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..711c9ead17a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.txt @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ +ARM Mali Bifrost GPU +====================
+Required properties:
+- compatible :
- Since Mali Bifrost GPU model/revision if fully discoverable by reading
^^s/if/is/
Should I still send a v5 to fixing this typo ? I can fix it while applying it.
No need to resend. I planned to apply it, but if you are going to:
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring robh@kernel.org