Let's test various parts of the rate-related clock API with the kunit testing framework.
Cc: kunit-dev@googlegroups.com Tested-by: Daniel Latypov dlatypov@google.com Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd sboyd@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard maxime@cerno.tech --- drivers/clk/.kunitconfig | 1 + drivers/clk/Kconfig | 7 + drivers/clk/Makefile | 1 + drivers/clk/clk_test.c | 787 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 796 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/clk/clk_test.c
diff --git a/drivers/clk/.kunitconfig b/drivers/clk/.kunitconfig index 3754fdb9485a..cdbc7d7deba9 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/.kunitconfig +++ b/drivers/clk/.kunitconfig @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ CONFIG_KUNIT=y CONFIG_COMMON_CLK=y +CONFIG_CLK_KUNIT_TEST=y CONFIG_CLK_GATE_KUNIT_TEST=y diff --git a/drivers/clk/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/Kconfig index 3cdf33470a75..2ef6eca297ff 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/clk/Kconfig @@ -429,6 +429,13 @@ source "drivers/clk/xilinx/Kconfig" source "drivers/clk/zynqmp/Kconfig"
# Kunit test cases +config CLK_KUNIT_TEST + tristate "Basic Clock Framework Kunit Tests" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS + depends on KUNIT + default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS + help + Kunit tests for the common clock framework. + config CLK_GATE_KUNIT_TEST tristate "Basic gate type Kunit test" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS depends on KUNIT diff --git a/drivers/clk/Makefile b/drivers/clk/Makefile index 6a98291350b6..8f9b1daba411 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/Makefile +++ b/drivers/clk/Makefile @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ # common clock types obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK) += clk-devres.o clk-bulk.o clkdev.o obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK) += clk.o +obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_KUNIT_TEST) += clk_test.o obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK) += clk-divider.o obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK) += clk-fixed-factor.o obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK) += clk-fixed-rate.o diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..a8d7eba01de7 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c @@ -0,0 +1,787 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Kunit test for clk rate management + */ +#include <linux/clk.h> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h> + +/* Needed for clk_hw_get_clk() */ +#include "clk.h" + +#include <kunit/test.h> + +#define DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE (42 * 1000 * 1000) +#define DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 (142 * 1000 * 1000) +#define DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 (242 * 1000 * 1000) + +struct clk_dummy_context { + struct clk_hw hw; + unsigned long rate; +}; + +static unsigned long clk_dummy_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, + unsigned long parent_rate) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = + container_of(hw, struct clk_dummy_context, hw); + + return ctx->rate; +} + +static int clk_dummy_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, + struct clk_rate_request *req) +{ + /* Just return the same rate without modifying it */ + return 0; +} + +static int clk_dummy_maximize_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, + struct clk_rate_request *req) +{ + /* + * If there's a maximum set, always run the clock at the maximum + * allowed. + */ + if (req->max_rate < ULONG_MAX) + req->rate = req->max_rate; + + return 0; +} + +static int clk_dummy_minimize_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, + struct clk_rate_request *req) +{ + /* + * If there's a minimum set, always run the clock at the minimum + * allowed. + */ + if (req->min_rate > 0) + req->rate = req->min_rate; + + return 0; +} + +static int clk_dummy_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, + unsigned long rate, + unsigned long parent_rate) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = + container_of(hw, struct clk_dummy_context, hw); + + ctx->rate = rate; + return 0; +} + +static const struct clk_ops clk_dummy_rate_ops = { + .recalc_rate = clk_dummy_recalc_rate, + .determine_rate = clk_dummy_determine_rate, + .set_rate = clk_dummy_set_rate, +}; + +static const struct clk_ops clk_dummy_maximize_rate_ops = { + .recalc_rate = clk_dummy_recalc_rate, + .determine_rate = clk_dummy_maximize_rate, + .set_rate = clk_dummy_set_rate, +}; + +static const struct clk_ops clk_dummy_minimize_rate_ops = { + .recalc_rate = clk_dummy_recalc_rate, + .determine_rate = clk_dummy_minimize_rate, + .set_rate = clk_dummy_set_rate, +}; + +static int clk_test_init_with_ops(struct kunit *test, const struct clk_ops *ops) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx; + struct clk_init_data init = { }; + int ret; + + ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ctx) + return -ENOMEM; + ctx->rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE; + test->priv = ctx; + + init.name = "test_dummy_rate"; + init.ops = ops; + ctx->hw.init = &init; + + ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + return 0; +} + +static int clk_test_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + return clk_test_init_with_ops(test, &clk_dummy_rate_ops); +} + +static int clk_maximize_test_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + return clk_test_init_with_ops(test, &clk_dummy_maximize_rate_ops); +} + +static int clk_minimize_test_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + return clk_test_init_with_ops(test, &clk_dummy_minimize_rate_ops); +} + +static void clk_test_exit(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + + clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->hw); +} + +/* + * Test that the actual rate matches what is returned by clk_get_rate() + */ +static void clk_test_get_rate(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = hw->clk; + unsigned long rate; + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, ctx->rate); +} + +/* + * Test that, after a call to clk_set_rate(), the rate returned by + * clk_get_rate() matches. + * + * This assumes that clk_ops.determine_rate or clk_ops.round_rate won't + * modify the requested rate, which is our case in clk_dummy_rate_ops. + */ +static void clk_test_set_get_rate(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = hw->clk; + unsigned long rate; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); +} + +/* + * Test that, after several calls to clk_set_rate(), the rate returned + * by clk_get_rate() matches the last one. + * + * This assumes that clk_ops.determine_rate or clk_ops.round_rate won't + * modify the requested rate, which is our case in clk_dummy_rate_ops. + */ +static void clk_test_set_set_get_rate(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = hw->clk; + unsigned long rate; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1), + 0); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); +} + +/* + * Test that clk_round_rate and clk_set_rate are consitent and will + * return the same frequency. + */ +static void clk_test_round_set_get_rate(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = hw->clk; + unsigned long rounded_rate, set_rate; + + rounded_rate = clk_round_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rounded_rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rounded_rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1), + 0); + + set_rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, set_rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rounded_rate, set_rate); +} + +static struct kunit_case clk_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_get_rate), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_set_get_rate), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_set_set_get_rate), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_round_set_get_rate), + {} +}; + +static struct kunit_suite clk_test_suite = { + .name = "clk-test", + .init = clk_test_init, + .exit = clk_test_exit, + .test_cases = clk_test_cases, +}; + +/* + * Test that clk_set_rate_range won't return an error for a valid range + * and that it will make sure the rate of the clock is within the + * boundaries. + */ +static void clk_range_test_set_range(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = hw->clk; + unsigned long rate; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); +} + +/* + * Test that calling clk_set_rate_range with a minimum rate higher than + * the maximum rate returns an error. + */ +static void clk_range_test_set_range_invalid(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = hw->clk; + + KUNIT_EXPECT_LT(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1), + 0); +} + +/* + * Test that users can't set multiple, disjoints, range that would be + * impossible to meet. + */ +static void clk_range_test_multiple_disjoints_range(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *user1, *user2; + + user1 = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, user1); + + user2 = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, user2); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(user1, 1000, 2000), + 0); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_LT(test, + clk_set_rate_range(user2, 3000, 4000), + 0); + + clk_put(user2); + clk_put(user1); +} + +/* + * Test that if our clock has some boundaries and we try to round a rate + * lower than the minimum, the returned rate won't be affected by the + * boundaries. + */ +static void clk_range_test_set_range_round_rate_lower(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = hw->clk; + long rate; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rate = clk_round_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 - 1000); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 - 1000); +} + +/* + * Test that if our clock has some boundaries and we try to set a rate + * lower than the minimum, we'll get an error. + */ +static void clk_range_test_set_range_set_rate_lower(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = hw->clk; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_LT(test, + clk_set_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 - 1000), + 0); +} + +/* + * Test that if our clock has some boundaries and we try to round and + * set a rate lower than the minimum, the values won't be consistent + * between clk_round_rate() and clk_set_rate(). + */ +static void clk_range_test_set_range_set_round_rate_consistent_lower(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = hw->clk; + long rounded; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rounded = clk_round_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 - 1000); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rounded, 0); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_LT(test, + clk_set_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 - 1000), + 0); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, rounded, clk_get_rate(clk)); +} + +/* + * Test that if our clock has some boundaries and we try to round a rate + * higher than the maximum, the returned rate won't be affected by the + * boundaries. + */ +static void clk_range_test_set_range_round_rate_higher(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = hw->clk; + long rate; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rate = clk_round_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 + 1000); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 + 1000); +} + +/* + * Test that if our clock has some boundaries and we try to set a rate + * lower than the maximum, we'll get an error. + */ +static void clk_range_test_set_range_set_rate_higher(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = hw->clk; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_LT(test, + clk_set_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 + 1000), + 0); +} + +/* + * Test that if our clock has some boundaries and we try to round and + * set a rate higher than the maximum, the values won't be consistent + * between clk_round_rate() and clk_set_rate(). + */ +static void clk_range_test_set_range_set_round_rate_consistent_higher(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = hw->clk; + long rounded; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rounded = clk_round_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 + 1000); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rounded, 0); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_LT(test, + clk_set_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 + 1000), + 0); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, rounded, clk_get_rate(clk)); +} + +/* + * Test that if our clock has a rate lower than the minimum set by a + * call to clk_set_rate_range(), the rate will be raised to match the + * new minimum. + * + * This assumes that clk_ops.determine_rate or clk_ops.round_rate won't + * modify the requested rate, which is our case in clk_dummy_rate_ops. + */ +static void clk_range_test_set_range_get_rate_raised(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = hw->clk; + unsigned long rate; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 - 1000), + 0); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); +} + +/* + * Test that if our clock has a rate higher than the maximum set by a + * call to clk_set_rate_range(), the rate will be lowered to match the + * new maximum. + * + * This assumes that clk_ops.determine_rate or clk_ops.round_rate won't + * modify the requested rate, which is our case in clk_dummy_rate_ops. + */ +static void clk_range_test_set_range_get_rate_lowered(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = hw->clk; + unsigned long rate; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 + 1000), + 0); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); +} + +static struct kunit_case clk_range_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_invalid), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_multiple_disjoints_range), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_round_rate_lower), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_set_rate_lower), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_set_round_rate_consistent_lower), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_round_rate_higher), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_set_rate_higher), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_set_round_rate_consistent_higher), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_get_rate_raised), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_get_rate_lowered), + {} +}; + +static struct kunit_suite clk_range_test_suite = { + .name = "clk-range-test", + .init = clk_test_init, + .exit = clk_test_exit, + .test_cases = clk_range_test_cases, +}; + +/* + * Test that if: + * - we have several subsequent calls to clk_set_rate_range(); + * - and we have a round_rate ops that always return the maximum + * frequency allowed; + * + * The clock will run at the minimum of all maximum boundaries + * requested, even if those boundaries aren't there anymore. + */ +static void clk_range_test_set_range_rate_maximized(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = hw->clk; + unsigned long rate; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 + 1000), + 0); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 - 1000), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 - 1000); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 - 1000); +} + +/* + * Test that if: + * - we have several subsequent calls to clk_set_rate_range(), across + * multiple users; + * - and we have a round_rate ops that always return the maximum + * frequency allowed; + * + * The clock will run at the minimum of all maximum boundaries + * requested, even if those boundaries aren't there anymore. + */ +static void clk_range_test_multiple_set_range_rate_maximized(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = hw->clk; + struct clk *user1, *user2; + unsigned long rate; + + user1 = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, user1); + + user2 = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, user2); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 + 1000), + 0); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(user1, + 0, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(user2, + 0, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(user2, 0, ULONG_MAX), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + + clk_put(user2); + clk_put(user1); +} + +static struct kunit_case clk_range_maximize_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_rate_maximized), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_multiple_set_range_rate_maximized), + {} +}; + +static struct kunit_suite clk_range_maximize_test_suite = { + .name = "clk-range-maximize-test", + .init = clk_maximize_test_init, + .exit = clk_test_exit, + .test_cases = clk_range_maximize_test_cases, +}; + +/* + * Test that if: + * - we have several subsequent calls to clk_set_rate_range() + * - and we have a round_rate ops that always return the minimum + * frequency allowed; + * + * The clock will run at the maximum of all minimum boundaries + * requested, even if those boundaries aren't there anymore. +*/ +static void clk_range_test_set_range_rate_minimized(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = hw->clk; + unsigned long rate; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 - 1000), + 0); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000); +} + +/* + * Test that if: + * - we have several subsequent calls to clk_set_rate_range(), across + * multiple users; + * - and we have a round_rate ops that always return the minimum + * frequency allowed; + * + * The clock will run at the maximum of all minimum boundaries + * requested, even if those boundaries aren't there anymore. +*/ +static void clk_range_test_multiple_set_range_rate_minimized(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = hw->clk; + struct clk *user1, *user2; + unsigned long rate; + + user1 = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, user1); + + user2 = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, user2); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(user1, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, + ULONG_MAX), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(user2, + DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2, + ULONG_MAX), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(user2, 0, ULONG_MAX), + 0); + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2); + + clk_put(user2); + clk_put(user1); +} + +static struct kunit_case clk_range_minimize_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_set_range_rate_minimized), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_range_test_multiple_set_range_rate_minimized), + {} +}; + +static struct kunit_suite clk_range_minimize_test_suite = { + .name = "clk-range-minimize-test", + .init = clk_minimize_test_init, + .exit = clk_test_exit, + .test_cases = clk_range_minimize_test_cases, +}; + +kunit_test_suites( + &clk_test_suite, + &clk_range_test_suite, + &clk_range_maximize_test_suite, + &clk_range_minimize_test_suite +); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");