On Mon, 07 Dec 2015, Archit Taneja architt@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 12/07/2015 02:15 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Mon, 07 Dec 2015, Archit Taneja architt@codeaurora.org wrote:
Hi,
On 11/30/2015 06:15 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
Hi Archit,
[auto build test ERROR on: v4.4-rc3] [also build test ERROR on: next-20151127]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Archit-Taneja/drm-dsi-DSI-for-devic... config: x86_64-allyesdebian (attached as .config) reproduce: # save the attached .config to linux build tree make ARCH=x86_64
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c: In function 'of_mipi_dsi_device_add':drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c:168:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_modalias_node' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
if (of_modalias_node(node, info.type, sizeof(info.type)) < 0) {Any suggestions on how to fix this? Is it ok to make DRM_MIPI_DSI depend on CONFIG_OF?
Please don't.
Just curious, how did x86 use DSI if the only way to create DSI devices until now was via DT?
Oh, you want the gory details... we use the DSI code as a library for abstraction and helpers, without actually creating or registering the devices.
BR, Jani.
Archit
BR, Jani.