On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 10:50:40AM +0100, walter harms wrote:
Am 25.02.2016 08:47, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
It's simpler to just use snprintf() to print this to one buffer instead of using strcpy() and strcat(). Also using snprintf() is slightly safer than using sprintf().
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpenter@oracle.com
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c index 9f8cfaa..d6b0bff 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c @@ -240,12 +240,10 @@ static int acp_poweron(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) static struct device *get_mfd_cell_dev(const char *device_name, int r) { char auto_dev_name[25];
char buf[8]; struct device *dev;
sprintf(buf, ".%d.auto", r);
strcpy(auto_dev_name, device_name);
strcat(auto_dev_name, buf);
- snprintf(auto_dev_name, sizeof(auto_dev_name),
dev = bus_find_device_by_name(&platform_bus_type, NULL, auto_dev_name); dev_info(dev, "device %s added to pm domain\n", auto_dev_name);"%s.%d.auto", device_name, r);
hi, i tried to understand what is the base for char auto_dev_name[25]. It is not clear from these snipped if that is large or small.
(To be aware i assume that get_mfd_cell_dev("terrible_long_and_Stupid_name",1234567899346712) will never happen but i could find no reason)
A small comment that explains the magic 25 would be nice.
I have no idea, either of course. For example, mc13xxx_add_subdevice_pdata() assumes device_name by itself can be 30 characters. Hence the change to snprintf.
regards, dan carpenter