Hi Christian,
Am Freitag, den 10.07.2020, 09:41 +0200 schrieb Christian Gmeiner:
This patch series add support for loadavg values for GPU sub-components. I am adding a SMA algorithm as I was not really sure if EWMA would be a good fit for this use case.
1 second is a pretty long window in GPU time. Why do you feel that a simple moving average is more appropriate than a exponentially weighted one here? Note that I haven't given this any thought myself and haven't made up my mind yet, so this is a honest question to understand the reasoning behind your choice.
Regards, Lucas
Christian Gmeiner (4): drm/etnaviv: add simple moving average (SMA) drm/etnaviv: add loadavg accounting drm/etnaviv: show loadavg in debugfs drm/etnaviv: export loadavg via perfmon
drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_drv.c | 14 ++++ drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gpu.c | 44 ++++++++++++- drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gpu.h | 29 +++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_perfmon.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_sma.h | 53 +++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 218 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_sma.h