Le 30/09/2021 à 16:21, Daniel Vetter a écrit :
On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 08:46:12PM +0800, Cai Huoqing wrote:
Replace direction definition PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL with DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL, because it helps to enhance readability and avoid possible inconsistency.
Signed-off-by: Cai Huoqing caihuoqing@baidu.com
Applied to drm-intel-gt-next, thanks for the patch. -Daniel
Hi, just in case, a similar patch received some (unrelated) comments a few weeks ago. See [1].
Should it rings some bells to someone who know who knows what should be done.
Just my 2c.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/kernel-janitors/0cd61d5b-ac88-31e8-99ad-143af480416f...
CJ
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c | 17 ++++++++--------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 4 ++-- 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c index a74b72f50cc9..afb35d2e5c73 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static int init_fake_lmem_bar(struct intel_memory_region *mem) mem->remap_addr = dma_map_resource(i915->drm.dev, mem->region.start, mem->fake_mappable.size,
PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL,
DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL, DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS);@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static void release_fake_lmem_bar(struct intel_memory_region *mem) dma_unmap_resource(mem->i915->drm.dev, mem->remap_addr, mem->fake_mappable.size,
PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL,
DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL, DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS);diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c index e5c2fdfc20e3..53d0cb327539 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c @@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ static void ppgtt_free_spt(struct intel_vgpu_ppgtt_spt *spt) trace_spt_free(spt->vgpu->id, spt, spt->guest_page.type);
dma_unmap_page(kdev, spt->shadow_page.mfn << I915_GTT_PAGE_SHIFT, 4096,
PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);radix_tree_delete(&spt->vgpu->gtt.spt_tree, spt->shadow_page.mfn);
@@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ static struct intel_vgpu_ppgtt_spt *ppgtt_alloc_spt( */ spt->shadow_page.type = type; daddr = dma_map_page(kdev, spt->shadow_page.page,
0, 4096, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
0, 4096, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);@@ -865,7 +865,7 @@ static struct intel_vgpu_ppgtt_spt *ppgtt_alloc_spt( return spt;
err_unmap_dma:
- dma_unmap_page(kdev, daddr, PAGE_SIZE, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
- dma_unmap_page(kdev, daddr, PAGE_SIZE, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL); err_free_spt: free_spt(spt); return ERR_PTR(ret);
@@ -2409,8 +2409,7 @@ static int alloc_scratch_pages(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, return -ENOMEM; }
- daddr = dma_map_page(dev, virt_to_page(scratch_pt), 0,
4096, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
- daddr = dma_map_page(dev, virt_to_page(scratch_pt), 0, 4096, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL); if (dma_mapping_error(dev, daddr)) { gvt_vgpu_err("fail to dmamap scratch_pt\n"); __free_page(virt_to_page(scratch_pt));
@@ -2461,7 +2460,7 @@ static int release_scratch_page_tree(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu) if (vgpu->gtt.scratch_pt[i].page != NULL) { daddr = (dma_addr_t)(vgpu->gtt.scratch_pt[i].page_mfn << I915_GTT_PAGE_SHIFT);
dma_unmap_page(dev, daddr, 4096, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
dma_unmap_page(dev, daddr, 4096, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL); __free_page(vgpu->gtt.scratch_pt[i].page); vgpu->gtt.scratch_pt[i].page = NULL; vgpu->gtt.scratch_pt[i].page_mfn = 0;@@ -2741,7 +2740,7 @@ int intel_gvt_init_gtt(struct intel_gvt *gvt) }
daddr = dma_map_page(dev, virt_to_page(page), 0,
4096, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
4096, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);@@ -2755,7 +2754,7 @@ int intel_gvt_init_gtt(struct intel_gvt *gvt) ret = setup_spt_oos(gvt); if (ret) { gvt_err("fail to initialize SPT oos\n");
dma_unmap_page(dev, daddr, 4096, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
dma_unmap_page(dev, daddr, 4096, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL); __free_page(gvt->gtt.scratch_page); return ret;@@ -2779,7 +2778,7 @@ void intel_gvt_clean_gtt(struct intel_gvt *gvt) dma_addr_t daddr = (dma_addr_t)(gvt->gtt.scratch_mfn << I915_GTT_PAGE_SHIFT);
- dma_unmap_page(dev, daddr, 4096, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
dma_unmap_page(dev, daddr, 4096, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
__free_page(gvt->gtt.scratch_page);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c index 7efa386449d1..20b82fb036f8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c @@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ static int gvt_dma_map_page(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, unsigned long gfn, return ret;
/* Setup DMA mapping. */
- *dma_addr = dma_map_page(dev, page, 0, size, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
- *dma_addr = dma_map_page(dev, page, 0, size, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL); if (dma_mapping_error(dev, *dma_addr)) { gvt_vgpu_err("DMA mapping failed for pfn 0x%lx, ret %d\n", page_to_pfn(page), ret);
@@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static void gvt_dma_unmap_page(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, unsigned long gfn, { struct device *dev = vgpu->gvt->gt->i915->drm.dev;
- dma_unmap_page(dev, dma_addr, size, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
- dma_unmap_page(dev, dma_addr, size, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL); gvt_unpin_guest_page(vgpu, gfn, size); }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c index 36489be4896b..cd5f2348a187 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ int i915_gem_gtt_prepare_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, do { if (dma_map_sg_attrs(obj->base.dev->dev, pages->sgl, pages->nents,
PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL,
DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL, DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC | DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING | DMA_ATTR_NO_WARN))@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ void i915_gem_gtt_finish_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, usleep_range(100, 250);
dma_unmap_sg(i915->drm.dev, pages->sgl, pages->nents,
PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);}
/**
-- 2.25.1