On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 11:12:34AM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
Hi Matt,
On 30 September 2015 at 17:30, Matt Roper matthew.d.roper@intel.com wrote:
If the opendir() call in drmGetDevices() returns failure, we jump to an error label that calls closedir() and then returns. However this means that we're calling closedir(NULL) which may not be safe on all implementations. We are also leaking the local_devices array that was allocated before the opendir() call.
Fix both of these issues by jumping to an earlier error label (to free local_devices) and guarding the closedir() call with a NULL test.
Cc: Emil Velikov emil.l.velikov@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Matt Roper matthew.d.roper@intel.com
xf86drm.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xf86drm.c b/xf86drm.c index c1cab1b..763d710 100644 --- a/xf86drm.c +++ b/xf86drm.c @@ -3209,7 +3209,7 @@ int drmGetDevices(drmDevicePtr devices[], int max_devices) sysdir = opendir(DRM_DIR_NAME); if (!sysdir) { ret = -errno;
goto close_sysdir;
goto free_locals;}
i = 0;
@@ -3280,9 +3280,10 @@ int drmGetDevices(drmDevicePtr devices[], int max_devices)
free_devices: drmFreeDevices(local_devices, i); +free_locals: free(local_devices);
-close_sysdir:
- closedir(sysdir);
- if (sysdir)
closedir(sysdir);Any objections if we move the new label & free() here and drop the if check above? I can do that before pushing if that's ok with you.
Thanks for catching this. Emil
Sure, that sounds fine too. Thanks!
Matt