28 May
2015
28 May
'15
3:16 a.m.
On 27 May 2015 at 20:04, Frediano Ziglio fziglio@redhat.com wrote:
Only EBUSY error was handled. This could cause code to believe reserve was successful while it failed.
Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio fziglio@redhat.com
This has been there since I wrote qxl, so I expect I had some reason for it, but I can't remember it now..
Most likely is something had the bo reserved already and we reentered from somewhere we shouldn't but I think a lot of the horrible code went away.
so because I can't justify the hack, Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie airlied@redhat.com Dave.