We already clear the IRQ status register before processing IRQs, so do not clear the register again. Especially do not clear the IRQ status _after_ processing the IRQ as this way we can loose the event.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org --- .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c | 17 ----------------- 1 file changed, 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c index 8e890f981afd..17ad78d49948 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c @@ -120,21 +120,6 @@ static const struct dpu_intr_reg dpu_intr_set[] = { #define DPU_IRQ_REG(irq_idx) (irq_idx / 32) #define DPU_IRQ_MASK(irq_idx) (BIT(irq_idx % 32))
-static void dpu_hw_intr_clear_intr_status_nolock(struct dpu_hw_intr *intr, - int irq_idx) -{ - int reg_idx; - - if (!intr) - return; - - reg_idx = DPU_IRQ_REG(irq_idx); - DPU_REG_WRITE(&intr->hw, dpu_intr_set[reg_idx].clr_off, DPU_IRQ_MASK(irq_idx)); - - /* ensure register writes go through */ - wmb(); -} - /** * dpu_core_irq_callback_handler - dispatch core interrupts * @arg: private data of callback handler @@ -203,8 +188,6 @@ irqreturn_t dpu_core_irq(struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms)
dpu_core_irq_callback_handler(dpu_kms, irq_idx);
- dpu_hw_intr_clear_intr_status_nolock(intr, irq_idx); - /* * When callback finish, clear the irq_status * with the matching mask. Once irq_status