On 29/07/15 13:12, Thierry Reding wrote:
From: Thierry Reding treding@nvidia.com
The current driver name, "panel", is very generic. This causes problems when the driver is enabled on non-TI device tree platforms if the panel node is called "panel". This causes the driver name match fall-back in platform_match() to succeed, even if some other driver would precisely match using the OF device ID table, for example.
Currently there don't seem to be any in-tree users that rely on the driver name match, so adding the prefix should be safe.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding treding@nvidia.com
drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_panel.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_panel.c index 7a0315855e90..375505caf9c7 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_panel.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_panel.c @@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ struct platform_driver panel_driver = { .remove = panel_remove, .driver = { .owner = THIS_MODULE,
.name = "panel",
.name = "tilcdc-panel",};
I didn't know we do matching based on the node name also...
This looks fine, I believe the tilcdc is only used with DT based systems. I'll pick this up.
Tomi